fundamental. FUNdaMENTAL. fundaMENtal. funDAmental. so many implications of having a base and so badly do i need one that i use a word misuse a word abuse a word so often and how often do we critique those narrowminded FUNdamentalists but at least (i say) they have a base. "it is good to be openminded, but not, perhaps, so much so that one's brains drop out." a recent reading, paraphrased and perhaps applicable, because (alas!) i have tried quite hard to keep my mind open to all things and in honest consideration weigh each thing before me. it is, i am quite sure, the right thing to do, and yet it leaves you, out of necessity, with so few things to stand upon! perhaps this is why the old grow stiff and curmudgeonly. they want to stop this madness of considering first one thing than another, this flitting approval of the truth to rest, like a hyperactive butterfly on one viewpoint then the next. but i feel then more like the hummingbird, not flitting, but probing deep into each flower and extracting whatever god-drink may be found there. but do you have any idea how long the hummingbird lives? its fearful and unsettled pace can't allow much time for happiness. and the happiest people i ever saw were in the poorest place i ever saw and how do you work this back into westernism being an ideal because what is our BASE? our FUNDAMENTalism? upon what construct do we view our lives do we seek truth and self-fulfillment? we have none, not yet. is it better to be knowledgeable and wise or to be delightfully happy with life? can one have both? [the answer isn't known] so desperate children as myself cheaply toss around such words in the hope that a base will come (of speaking) and bring contentedness. |